Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Is Postgres comparable to MSSQL

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: ahester(at)galacticltd(dot)com, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Is Postgres comparable to MSSQL
Date: 2005-10-17 17:11:59
Message-ID: 20051017171159.GY86144@pervasive.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 09:56:12AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> That being said, here's a short list of major PostgreSQL users:
> 
> National Weather Service
> Cisco
> Ameritrade
> Fujitsu
> SRA Inc.
> Sony
> Yamaha
> US Army
> Library of Congress
> Afilias (.ORG and .INFO domains)
> Sun Microsystems
> Federal Gov't of Venezuala
> Sao Paolo Muni
> NTT Data
> 
> ... so I think PostgreSQL should be "good enough" for your 50-person 
> company.  One interesting example is TravelPost.com, which is using 
> PostGIS with ASP.NET, and finds the performance of Postgres, even with 
> .NET, to be superior to SQL Server.

Can we get any of that on the website somewhere?
-- 
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software      http://pervasive.com    work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf       cell: 512-569-9461

In response to

Responses

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Chris BrowneDate: 2005-10-17 17:14:57
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Oracle buys Innobase
Previous:From: Scott MarloweDate: 2005-10-17 17:01:29
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Oracle buys Innobase

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group