Re: On "multi-master"

From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: On "multi-master"
Date: 2005-10-13 18:46:34
Message-ID: 20051013184634.GR16317@phlogiston.dyndns.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 02:30:11PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> This particular issue is fixable as of 8.1: pgpool should be using
> 2-phase commit.

Sure, but if we're talking about what people can put in production
today, I don't think 8.1 + pgpool with 2-phase commit is on the list.
(We got started down this road, I think, because someone was wanting
a multi-master system right away.) But I think it will be soon.

A

--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
A certain description of men are for getting out of debt, yet are
against all taxes for raising money to pay it off.
--Alexander Hamilton

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alex Turner 2005-10-13 18:58:27 Re: PostgreSQL 8.1 vs. MySQL 5.0?
Previous Message Marc Munro 2005-10-13 18:41:42 Re: Setting up a fine-grained permission system