Re: BUG #1956: Plpgsql top-level DECLARE does not share scope

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Karl O(dot) Pinc" <kop(at)meme(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #1956: Plpgsql top-level DECLARE does not share scope
Date: 2005-10-13 14:38:36
Message-ID: 200510131438.j9DEcaL04470@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Karl O. Pinc wrote:
>
> On 10/12/2005 10:32:20 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> We tend to follow the C conventions, so perhaps we
> > should
> > throw a warning, but I can't think of any cases where we throw a
> > warning
> > in plpgsql because we compile it once on first call.
> >
> > I am thinking this falls in the "don't do that" category.
>
> Fair enough. At the same time it sure would be nice if
> plpgsql actually compiled (and parsed SQL) at
> function definition time, even when the result is thrown away.
> I'm building a big system and it's quite annoying
> to get syntax errors, IIRC,
> in code months after writing it, just because it took
> me that long to get around to exercising a particular
> IF statement.

8.0 has this improvement:

* Do minimal syntax checking of PL/pgSQL functions at creation time (Tom)
This allows us to catch simple syntax errors sooner.

I assume you are running an earlier version of PostgreSQL.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-10-13 14:39:38 Re: building Postgresql 7.3.10 on Mac OS X 10.4
Previous Message Charles Wegrzyn 2005-10-13 13:24:27 BUG #1962: ECPG and VARCHAR