Re: PostgreSQL's bug tracker

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, J B <jbwellsiv(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL's bug tracker
Date: 2005-10-11 01:12:30
Message-ID: 20051010220910.K1477@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, 10 Oct 2005, Joshua D. Drake wrote:

>
>> IIRC the last time this was brought up it was violently shot-down on
>> -hackers (and the fact that bugzilla didn't directly support PostgreSQL
>> back then had nothing to do with it).
>>

> Yep, but you never know. Someday it just may happen. The community got
> Linus to stop using his email box for patches, maybe someday we will get
> there too.

Just as a suggestion/thought ... *if* you have the resources (or someone
else wants to step up to it), why not setup the bug tracker, work with the
-www guys on having the 'bug submission' stuff feed into it, and get a
liason in place between it and -hackers? put the structure into place,
get ppl used to submitting/using it, and over time, it might be easier to
get the developers themselves to use it vs having a middle man?

There may be some developers that will go over relatively easily *once*
its in place, and others that stay resistent to it for awhile ...

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-10-11 01:28:29 Re: PostgreSQL's bug tracker
Previous Message CSN 2005-10-11 01:04:46 Dumb question about serial's upper limit