Re: BUG #1947: Enhancement Request - CONCAT() function

From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: Tony Marston <tony(at)marston-home(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "'Jim C(dot) Nasby'" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #1947: Enhancement Request - CONCAT() function
Date: 2005-10-09 17:19:46
Message-ID: 20051009171946.GG24701@fetter.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 11:05:41AM +0100, Tony Marston wrote:
>
> > "Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> writes:
> > > And you might want to make it a project at http://pgfoundry.org
> > > so others can make use of it. You might also want to define it
> > > as accepting an array; I think that would allow you to accept
> > > any number of parameters.
> >
> > I think Tony is trying to avoid putting in any actual work ;-).
> > To me, the sanest change would be to modify his app to use the
> > SQL-standard syntax. Which surely is supported by those other
> > databases too, no? And if not, why are *we* the ones getting the
> > bug report?
> >
> > regards, tom lane
>
> You are getting this as a bug report for the simple reason that your
> website does not seem to have a method of accepting enhancement
> requests. That is why I specifically put ENHANCEMENT REQUEST in the
> description.

I've never seen somebody try so hard to get himself labeled as a
help-rejecting complainer before. Are you *certain* that this is what
you want to do, Tony?

Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter david(at)fetter(dot)org http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 510 893 6100 mobile: +1 415 235 3778

Remember to vote!

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tony Marston 2005-10-09 19:12:07 Re: BUG #1947: Enhancement Request - CONCAT() function
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2005-10-09 16:42:01 Re: BUG #1937: Parts of information_schema only accessible to owner