Re: Vote needed: revert beta2 changes or not?

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Vote needed: revert beta2 changes or not?
Date: 2005-10-07 01:57:33
Message-ID: 20051006225655.A1477@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 6 Oct 2005, mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc wrote:

> I don't get a vote - but I do want to suggest, as a user, that I get
> generally annoyed with the presence of interfaces with names that
> were chosen for historical reasons, but are maintained only for
> compatibility, and either never did, or no longer apply.
>
> I'd rather you left it fixed. Returning it to the old name, for the
> sake of process, and no other good reason, doesn't appeal to me. It is
> a lesson learned. We move on. Enforce the process next time. Self
> inflicted punishment is somewhat masochistic. :-)

If we don't enforce the process this time, why would we enforce it next
time?

You either always enforce it, or never ... you don't pick and choose
though ...

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2005-10-07 01:59:33 Re: Vote needed: revert beta2 changes or not?
Previous Message Rod Taylor 2005-10-07 01:53:35 Re: Vote needed: revert beta2 changes or not?