| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Beta2 Wrap Up ... |
| Date: | 2005-09-19 15:56:10 |
| Message-ID: | 20050919125545.Y1105@ganymede.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 19 Sep 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
>> Is there a reason the old/new can't be aliaseed to each other, instead of
>> the old just being removed?
>
> Any change like that would require another initdb. If we were going to
> force another initdb, my vote would be to revert these functions to
> where they were in beta1. It was a mistake to change them in such a
> hurry.
+1 on reverting them back then ... and on a quick beta3 (ie. by end of
week?)
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Stark | 2005-09-19 16:21:00 | Re: Does anybody use ORDER BY x USING y? |
| Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2005-09-19 15:45:10 | Re: DISTINCT vs. GROUP BY |