| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches |
| Date: | 2005-09-12 03:58:17 |
| Message-ID: | 20050912035817.GI6026@ns.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Stephen Frost (sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net) wrote:
> > Thanks. If you've got the time, could you try the two patches
> > separately and see what you get?
>
> Sure.
[...]
Just to be clear- this was from a completely default 'make install'
using the Debian configure options from 8.0.3 (which aren't that
particularly interesting really- nls, integer-datetimes, debug,
disable-rpath, tcl, perl, python, pam, krb5, openssl, gnu-ld,
enable-thread-safety). If it'd be useful for the test I can adjust
whichever parameters are appropriate (work_mem, cache_size, etc).
There's absolutely nothing else going on except for these test, a few
shells, top, etc, on the box.
Enjoy,
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-09-12 04:12:46 | Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches |
| Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2005-09-12 03:40:11 | Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches |