| From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Matt Miller <mattm(at)epx(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Simple tester for MVCC in PostgreSQL |
| Date: | 2005-09-06 18:56:24 |
| Message-ID: | 20050906185624.GT60481@pervasive.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 06:21:11PM +0200, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 03:51:41PM +0000, Matt Miller wrote:
> > On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 00:56 +0200, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> > > http://svana.org/kleptog/pgsql/mvcctest.tar.gz
> >
> > I've started using it in some simple cases and it seems to be a good
> > tool. The feature set looks to me to be a pretty solid core on which to
> > build.
>
> Very nice. I too think the base is sufficient for quite complicated
> tests. I actually wrote a script which tested all pairs of locks to
> ensure they blocked exactly as the documentation said they should. And
> it passed.
Should we add this stuff to the regression tests (probably as a seperate
option since not everyone will want to install perl)?
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | huaxin zhang | 2005-09-06 19:21:16 | count(*) optimization |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-09-06 18:54:49 | Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion |