Re: Observation about db response time

From: Frank Wiles <frank(at)wiles(dot)org>
To: "Akshay Mathur" <akshay(dot)mathur(at)airtightnetworks(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Observation about db response time
Date: 2005-08-30 13:13:22
Message-ID: 20050830081322.20a13d4f.frank@wiles.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 18:35:30 +0530
"Akshay Mathur" <akshay(dot)mathur(at)airtightnetworks(dot)net> wrote:

> Hello Friends,
>
> We were having a database in pgsql7.4.2 The database was responding
> very slowly even after full vacuum analyze (select count(*) from
> some_table_having_18000_records was taking 18 Sec).
>
> We took a backup of that db and restored it back. Now the same db on
> same PC is responding fast (same query is taking 18 ms).
>
> But we can't do the same as a solution of slow response. Do anybody
> has faced similar problem? Is this due to any internal problem of
> pgsql? Is there any clue to fasten the database?

This could be because you don't have max_fsm_pages and
max_fsm_relations setup correctly or are not doing full vacuums
often enough.

If your database deletes a ton of data as a matter of course then
sometimes a full vacuum will not clear up as much space as it could.

Try increasing those configuration values and doing vacuums more
often.

If you should also explore upgrading to the latest 8.0 as you will
no doubt see noticeable speed improvements.

---------------------------------
Frank Wiles <frank(at)wiles(dot)org>
http://www.wiles.org
---------------------------------

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruno Wolff III 2005-08-30 13:50:18 Re: RAID Configuration Sugestion
Previous Message Akshay Mathur 2005-08-30 13:05:30 Observation about db response time