Re: PG8 Tuning

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Michael Stone <mstone+postgres(at)mathom(dot)us>
Subject: Re: PG8 Tuning
Date: 2005-08-17 20:39:47
Message-ID: 200508171339.47399.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Michael,

> Well, you don't have to spend *quite* that much to get a decent storage
> array. :)

Yes, I'm just pointing out that it's only the extreme cases which are
clear-cut. Middle cases are a lot harder to define. For example, we've
found that on DBT2 running of a 14-drive JBOD, seperating off WAL boosts
performance about 8% to 14%. On DBT3 (DSS) seperate WAL (and seperate
tablespaces) helps considerably during data load,but not otherwise. So it
all depends.

> That's a different creature from
> a data mining app that might really benefit from having additional
> spindles to accelerate read performance from indices much larger than
> RAM.

Yes, although the data mining app benefits from the special xlog disk
during ETL. So it's a tradeoff.

> At any rate, this just underscores the need for testing a
> particular workload on particular hardware

Yes, absolutely.

--
--Josh

Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2005-08-17 20:40:34 bitmap scan issues 8.1 devel
Previous Message Matthew Nuzum 2005-08-17 20:33:52 Re: Need for speed