| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>, Thomas Hallgren <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pl/Ruby, deprecating plPython and Core |
| Date: | 2005-08-17 20:14:01 |
| Message-ID: | 200508171314.01878.josh@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thomas, Dave,
I did *NOT* want to start another discussion about what approach is
superior. Keep in mind that for us non-Java geeks most of your argument
is pure ancient Greek.
What I wanted to establish is: potentially, we will have two Java PLs with
Postgres. If we do, we need to have a clear documentation section
explaining why there are two and why a user might want to choose one or
the other. This explanation should be comprehensible to a neophyte Java
programmer and even to a DBA who doesn't do Java but has to install it.
--
--Josh
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-08-17 20:15:52 | Re: pthread stack on FreeBSD WAS: HEAD doesn't cope with libraries |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-08-17 19:54:07 | Re: do we need inet_ntop check? |