Re: [HACKERS] Planner doesn't look at LIMIT?

From: Sam Mason <sam(at)samason(dot)me(dot)uk>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Planner doesn't look at LIMIT?
Date: 2005-07-23 10:42:35
Message-ID: 20050723104235.GM62747@colo.samason.me.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

Tom Lane wrote:
>Could be. I went back to look at Sam Mason's report about three weeks
>ago, and it definitely seems to explain his issue.

I've just built a patched version as well and it appears to be doing
what I think is the right thing now. I.e. actually picking the
plan with the lower cost.

Thanks!

Sam

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruno Wolff III 2005-07-23 13:41:07 Re: [HACKERS] Enticing interns to PostgreSQL
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2005-07-23 08:02:19 Re: A Guide to Constraint Exclusion (Partitioning)

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Mendenhall 2005-07-23 16:50:34 re: performance decrease after reboot
Previous Message Luke Lonergan 2005-07-23 04:09:10 Re: [PATCHES] COPY FROM performance improvements