Re: To Postgres or not

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: Vivek Khera <vivek(at)khera(dot)org>, pgsql-general General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: To Postgres or not
Date: 2005-07-14 04:57:57
Message-ID: 20050714045757.GA16740@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 02:46:01PM +1000, Neil Conway wrote:
> Vivek Khera wrote:
> >The first sentence rules out MySQL, so the second sentence should read
> >"So that leaves Postgres". Your problem is solved ;-)
> >
> >(If you are accustomed to Oracle, you are probably expecting an ACID
> >database, which rules out MySQL too).
>
> Does MySQL with InnoDB not qualify as an ACID-compliant database?

Not if you intermix InnoDB tables with MyISAM tables, which AFAIK many
people seem to do.

--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]alvh.no-ip.org>)
"Porque francamente, si para saber manejarse a uno mismo hubiera que
rendir examen... ¿Quién es el machito que tendría carnet?" (Mafalda)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2005-07-14 05:07:02 Re: Japanese words not distinguished
Previous Message Neil Conway 2005-07-14 04:46:01 Re: To Postgres or not