Re: Server instrumentation patch

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Server instrumentation patch
Date: 2005-06-22 04:13:21
Message-ID: 20050622011212.L993@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 21 Jun 2005, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> I am not aware they were all addressed, and if you had terminate in
> there, which was clearly not addressed, I question whether the others
> issues are addressed too. I think we need to re-discuss the idea of
> these functions.

Just curious, but if 'all issues were discussed', maybe instead of
're-discussing' it, why not just read through the archives that should be
available of that discussion ... ?

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-06-22 04:27:02 Re: pl/pgsql: END verbosity
Previous Message Rod Taylor 2005-06-22 04:00:49 Re: pg_terminate_backend idea