Re: Conventions for release numbering

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: elein <elein(at)varlena(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Conventions for release numbering
Date: 2005-06-13 02:13:15
Message-ID: 20050612231145.X90456@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Sun, 12 Jun 2005, elein wrote:

> (No, wait, I'm not starting a release numbering discussion.)
>
>
> If we have release 8.0.3 where 8 is the Major releae,
> 0 is the minor release and 3 is the version (revision?),
> how would we refer to a generic release number:
>
> postgresql-M.m.v ? postgresql-M.m.r ?
>
> Is this our convention? Do either of these work?

Assuming v==version and r==release, is there a big difference between the
two? How are each defined?

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message elein 2005-06-13 02:38:18 Re: Conventions for release numbering
Previous Message elein 2005-06-13 01:38:08 Conventions for release numbering