Re: Cost of XLogInsert CRC calculations

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Mark Cave-Ayland <m(dot)cave-ayland(at)webbased(dot)co(dot)uk>, "'Manfred Koizar'" <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at>, "'Greg Stark'" <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Cost of XLogInsert CRC calculations
Date: 2005-05-27 20:37:59
Message-ID: 200505272037.j4RKbxq04977@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Alternatively, we might say that 64-bit CRC was overkill from day one,
> and we'd rather get the additional 10% or 20% or so speedup. I'm kinda
> leaning in that direction, but only weakly.

Yes, I lean in that direction too since the CRC calculation is showing
up in our profiling.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-05-27 21:25:50 Re: [HACKERS] Fix PID file location?
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2005-05-27 18:34:31 OSCON field trip, Friday afternoon