| From: | Himanshu Baweja <himanshubaweja(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: maintenance_work_mem upper limit =1gb?? |
| Date: | 2005-05-26 19:44:19 |
| Message-ID: | 20050526194419.4980.qmail@web51001.mail.yahoo.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Tom Lane writes:
>Himanshu Baweja writes:
>> why has been maintenance_work_mem and work_mem been
>> restricted to 1gb...
>So as not to overflow on 32-bit machines.
then why not add a check during configure(before compiling) to check if its a 32 or 64 bit machine.... in the past we have seen servers like DEC and Sun... which although 32 bit used to support much more memory.... although i can just give suggestion... its upto u to see whts good and whts not...
by the way i have started to like postgres.. it really roks... thx to all the developers :)
Regards
Himanshu
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vivek Khera | 2005-05-26 19:48:08 | Re: pg_listener records |
| Previous Message | Junaili Lie | 2005-05-26 19:30:51 | Archiving solution |