Re: Allow change of kerberos service name without recompilation

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Daniel Ahlin <dah(at)pdc(dot)kth(dot)se>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Allow change of kerberos service name without recompilation
Date: 2005-05-20 18:02:25
Message-ID: 200505201802.j4KI2P613294@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


We have modified your patch and it will appear in 8.1. Thanks.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Daniel Ahlin wrote:
> Hi
>
> This is a two part patch against 7.4.5 implementing the option of
> configuring what is now set using the #defined constant PG_KRB_SRVNAM
> (the name of the service part of the kerberos principal the server
> uses).
>
> On the backend it can be configured by the (new) string option
> krb_srvnam in postgresql.conf.
>
> On the client it can be configured by setting the environment variable
> PGKRBSRVNAM.
>
> The default setting (for both) is the value given by PG_KRB_SRVNAM
> mentioned above.
>

Content-Description: Patch for backend

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

Content-Description: Interface patch

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

>
> The use of this is mainly if several different users want to run their
> own instance of postgresql on the same machine.
>
> Regards
> Daniel Ahlin

>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2005-05-20 18:43:48 Re: [HACKERS] Inherited constraints and search paths
Previous Message José Orlando Pereira 2005-05-20 17:34:53 Re: Two-phase commit issues