Re: ok you all win what is best opteron (I dont want a hosed system again)

From: Mike Nolan <nolan(at)gw(dot)tssi(dot)com>
To: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
Cc: jfradkin(at)wazagua(dot)com (Joel Fradkin), time(at)bigpond(dot)net(dot)au ('David Brown'), pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ok you all win what is best opteron (I dont want a hosed system again)
Date: 2005-05-14 22:16:52
Message-ID: 200505142216.j4EMGqGU021081@gw.tssi.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

> This can often be called for. I'm working on a 400GB data warehouse right
> now, and almost *all* of our queries run from materialized aggregate tables.

I thought that was pretty much the definition of data warehousing! :-)
--
Mike Nolan

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message William Yu 2005-05-15 00:43:48 Re: ok you all win what is best opteron (I dont want a hosed system
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2005-05-14 21:19:15 Re: ok you all win what is best opteron (I dont want a hosed system again)