Re: Oracle Style packages on postgres

Josh Berkus wrote:
> B-
>
> > Just saying "we need Oracle packages" doesn't make it happen. ?I have
> > followed the discussion and I still don't have a clear idea of the exact
> > additions that people want, and without that, nothing is likely to
> > happen. ?I don't even have something for the TODO list at this point.
>
> That's what I'm trying to help define.
>
> I think that private variables and private functions need to be part of the
> definition.

OK, so it seems we need:

C static/private functions for schemas
C static/private variables for schemas

Are private variables implemented via the temporary per-session schema?

nested schemas

What does the standard say?

Is that it?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073