Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Date: 2005-05-05 19:58:55
Message-ID: 200505051558.55390.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

On Thursday 05 May 2005 14:25, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Thu, 5 May 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Can I suggest that we focus on PLs first and foremost, since that will
> >> allow us to get stuff like pl/PHP, pl/Java, pl/J(?), and pl/R in place,
> >> and then ramp up other stuff as time permits?
> >
> > Agreed.
>
> 'k, if there are no disagreements ...

A big reason I wanted plphp in the main souce was because I wanted it to be
part of the core package to help ease installation to be just one download
and one run at configure. I have marvel at the irony that not only is this
not going to happen, I will actually now have to download additional packages
for things I used to get in the core package.

I guess this is progress, but I foresee a lot of "what version of plfoo did
you try to install against your database" posts coming into the lists.

--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2005-05-05 20:07:53 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2005-05-05 19:21:04 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruno Wolff III 2005-05-05 20:02:10 Re: Views, views, views! (long)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-05-05 19:56:46 Re: [HACKERS] A real puzzler: ANY way to recover?