| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement |
| Date: | 2005-05-04 14:40:56 |
| Message-ID: | 20050504113715.V53065@ganymede.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 4 May 2005, Christopher Browne wrote:
> A fairer comparison would be the BSD core systems. I believe that most
> of them have a considerably larger set of stuff in the "central CVS"...
Yup, and *everyone* with commit accesss has access to *everything* ... I
could intruduce a 1 bit change to one of the kernel sources and there is a
chance that nobody would ever notice it ... and this includes (or, at
least, the last time I did any work) port committers ...
And, as Josh pointed out, one of the goals with pgfoundry was/is to make
it easy for 'Project Admin' to add commit access to whomever they wish,
whenever they wish, something that doesn't happen with FreeBSD ... its
relatively rare that you see a new committer added, and not on a whim ...
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2005-05-04 14:45:17 | Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement |
| Previous Message | Dave Cramer | 2005-05-04 14:34:38 | Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement |