Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Date: 2005-05-02 19:51:02
Message-ID: 200505021951.j42Jp2d07393@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Mon, 2 May 2005, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> >>
> >> I'm not pointing fingers at you either :) But, you are one of how many
> >> that try and get 'added to core'? How many things do we have in contrib
> >> that the only person that does any 'whacking' is Tom? A couple I've seen
> >> patches go around for, but for a good portion of them, I imagine that they
> >> are 'dead except that Tom keeps fixing them' ...
> >
> > In contrib I would bet a lot. I have argued for the removal of TSearch (not
> > TSearch2) for example. Also RServ could probably stand to be removed.
>
> rserv was removed long ago ... not sure why tsearch is in there stil
> though ...

Why is dbmirror still there? Can't it be moved to pgfoundry?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-05-02 19:57:36 Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2005-05-02 19:31:44 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew - Supernews 2005-05-02 19:53:56 Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2005-05-02 19:31:44 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement