| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement |
| Date: | 2005-05-02 18:38:57 |
| Message-ID: | 20050502153742.S53065@ganymede.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2 May 2005, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I posted this compromise and no one replied so I thought everyone was OK
> with it. It gets it into CVS, but has a separate compile stage to deal
> with the recursive dependency problem.
Then what is the point of having it in CVS? Other then to make are tar
ball bigger?
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2005-05-02 18:40:17 | Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-05-02 18:35:33 | Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2005-05-02 18:40:17 | Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-05-02 18:37:04 | Re: pg_locks needs a facelift |