Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Russell Smith <mr-russ(at)pws(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Psql_General (E-mail)" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?
Date: 2005-04-05 15:33:39
Message-ID: 20050405123222.L18194@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 5 Apr 2005, Russell Smith wrote:

> I may be a bad man for suggesting it... But is it possible to ship
> libpq as a seperate tarball that you can compile without postgresql
> server?

Actually, its something that I'm going to sit down and work on ... not
pulling libpq out of core, but creating a 'dist' target to makes a tar
ball that includes everything required to build it seperately ... its a
matter of finding the time to do it :(

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2005-04-05 15:43:21 Re: PL/PERL: raise notice, exception ?
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-04-05 15:26:24 Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleg Bartunov 2005-04-05 15:33:51 Re: Should we still require RETURN in plpgsql?
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-04-05 15:26:24 Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?