Re: Real-Time Vacuum Possibility

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
To: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Real-Time Vacuum Possibility
Date: 2005-03-21 08:04:35
Message-ID: 20050321080435.GK51784@decibel.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 05:22:41AM +0000, Christopher Browne wrote:
> What strikes me as being a useful approach would be to set up an
> LRU-ordered (or perhaps unordered) queue of pages that have had tuples
> "killed off" by DELETE or UPDATE.

From http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs.TODO.html :

* Maintain a map of recently-expired rows

This allows vacuum to reclaim free space without requiring
a sequential scan
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828

Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Qingqing Zhou 2005-03-21 09:56:44 Prevent conflicting SET options from being set
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2005-03-21 06:59:55 Re: custome exception handling support ?