Re: WIN1252 patch broke my database

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WIN1252 patch broke my database
Date: 2005-03-18 16:07:13
Message-ID: 200503181707.14566.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Am Donnerstag, 17. März 2005 19:23 schrieb Tom Lane:
> It doesn't eliminate the need for initdb, because pg_conversion contains
> instances of the client-only encoding numbers. I think that clients
> know the client-only encoding numbers too, so I'm not sure we aren't
> stuck with a compatibility issue.

I think the problem case was old pg_dump versions saving the encoding number
rather than name. I don't recall any problems with renumbering the client
encodings. I believe that we in fact did that in 8.0.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-03-18 16:21:13 Re: WIN1252 patch broke my database
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2005-03-18 15:56:36 Re: [HACKERS] "they only drink coffee at dec"