Re: caches lifetime with SQL vs PL/PGSQL procs

From: strk(at)refractions(dot)net
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, postgis-devel(at)postgis(dot)refractions(dot)net
Subject: Re: caches lifetime with SQL vs PL/PGSQL procs
Date: 2005-03-16 12:58:44
Message-ID: 20050316125844.GA23743@freek.keybit.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I've tested with 8.0.1 and get same results.

--strk;

On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 01:04:03PM +0100, strk(at)refractions(dot)net wrote:
> On postgresql-8.0.0 I've faced a *really* weird behavior.
>
> A simple query (single table - simple function call - no index),
> makes postgres process grow about as much as the memory size required
> to keep ALL rows in memory.
>
> The invoked procedure call doesn't leak.
> It's IMMUTABLE.
> Calls other procedures (not leaking).
>
> Now.
> One of the other procedures it calls is an 'SQL' one.
> Replacing it with a correponding 'PL/PGSQL' implementation
> drastically reduces memory occupation:
>
> SQL: 220Mb
> PL/PGSQL: 13Mb
>
> The function body is *really* simple:
>
> -- SQL
> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION get_proj4_from_srid(integer) RETURNS text AS
> 'SELECT proj4text::text FROM spatial_ref_sys WHERE srid= $1'
> LANGUAGE 'sql' IMMUTABLE STRICT;
>
> -- PL/PGSQL
> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION get_proj4_from_srid(integer) RETURNS text AS
> ' BEGIN
> RETURN proj4text::text FROM spatial_ref_sys WHERE srid= $1;
> END
> ' LANGUAGE 'plpgsql' IMMUTABLE STRICT;
>
>
> Is this expected ?
>
> --strk;

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message strk 2005-03-16 13:42:45 Re: caches lifetime with SQL vs PL/PGSQL procs
Previous Message Satoshi Nagayasu 2005-03-16 12:28:17 read-only database