| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mark Rae <mrae(at)purplebat(dot)com> |
| Cc: | postgres list <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: prelimiary performance comparison pgsql vs mysql |
| Date: | 2005-03-16 00:00:25 |
| Message-ID: | 200503160000.j2G00PC09518@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Mark Rae wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 06:46:50PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Mark Rae wrote:
> > > Also, while on the subject of scaling. I had the opportunity
> > > to try postgres on a 16CPU Altix and couldn't get it to scale
> > > more than about 4x, whereas Oracle got up to about 12x faster
> > >
> > We have had some major SMP improvements in current CVS. Were you
> > testing that or 8.0.X?
>
> It tried it with 8.0.0rc3, and had previously tried a 7.4 version
Oh, you have to try CVS HEAD or a nightly snapshot. Tom made a major
change that allows scaling in SMP environments.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Fuhr | 2005-03-16 00:00:43 | Re: plpython function problem workaround |
| Previous Message | Mark Rae | 2005-03-15 23:56:36 | Re: prelimiary performance comparison pgsql vs mysql |