Re: Recording vacuum/analyze/dump times

From: "Jim Buttafuoco" <jim(at)contactbda(dot)com>
To: "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Recording vacuum/analyze/dump times
Date: 2005-03-07 19:04:20
Message-ID: 20050307190317.M47137@contactbda.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

But what happens if I go in and manually vacuum a table (either because I just deleted a bunch of records or whatever).
This is why I think the backend should record the date in pg_class.

---------- Original Message -----------
From: "Matthew T. O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>
To: jim(at)contactbda(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Sent: Mon, 07 Mar 2005 13:56:04 -0500
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Recording vacuum/analyze/dump times

> Jim Buttafuoco wrote:
>
> >Its there a reason postgresql doesn't record vacuum/analyze and dump times in pg_class (or another table). This seems
> >like it would be a very helpful feature.
> >
> >for pg_dump I would add an option --record=YES|NO
> >for vacuum and analyze I would add a NORECORD|RECORD option
> >
> >
>
> For what it's worth, integrated pg_autovacuum will have something like
> this. At least my initial design does, since the autovacuum daemon
> needs to know remember when the last time a table was vacuumed.
------- End of Original Message -------

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2005-03-07 19:04:26 Re: About b-tree usage
Previous Message Matthew T. O'Connor 2005-03-07 18:56:04 Re: Recording vacuum/analyze/dump times