From: | "D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain" <darcy(at)druid(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Interesting NetBSD annual report |
Date: | 2005-02-25 13:42:51 |
Message-ID: | 20050225084251.5e4ae212.darcy@druid.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 23:00:48 -0500 (EST)
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I read the following report from the NetBSD group:
>
> http://kerneltrap.org/node/4680
>
> It has some interesting points. First, they analyze how the fit with
> other open source database offerings. Their position is somewhat
> similar to ours.
>
> Their development style is also similar to ours.
Not too surprising since both projects came out of Berkeley.
> They complain about release delays and the challenge of organizing
> volunteers, just like us.
Is there any volunteer organization that's any different? :-)
> Second, they have a much more rigid hierarchy structure. There are
> good and bad things about that and you can see it in the report.
It could be that the people really do make a difference but, as a NetBSD
developer, I never really feel that the hierarchy gets in the way of
doing things. I think that in any organization the people get stuff
done regardless of what structure is in place. It depends more on the
people than the structure.
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy(at)druid(dot)net> | Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on
+1 416 425 1212 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-02-25 14:42:57 | Re: Development Plans |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2005-02-25 10:34:12 | Development Plans |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-02-25 14:42:57 | Re: Development Plans |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2005-02-25 13:38:50 | Re: idea for concurrent seqscans |