| From: | Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Ing(dot) Jhon Carrillo" <jdigital(at)cantv(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Function .. AS..? |
| Date: | 2005-02-10 06:06:07 |
| Message-ID: | 20050209220435.D62999@megazone.bigpanda.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql |
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005, Ing. Jhon Carrillo wrote:
> Those instructions are good but i want to call this function only for "
> select consulta_contacto(1)" nothing more, Is really necesary to use
> "AS ..."?
If it absolutely needs to be setof record, yes.
It may be more appropriate to make a composite type with CREATE TYPE AS
and then make the function return SETOF <newtypename> instead.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Fuhr | 2005-02-10 06:16:19 | Re: [SQL] Function .. AS..? |
| Previous Message | Hicham G. Elmongui | 2005-02-10 03:25:20 | enforcing a plan |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Fuhr | 2005-02-10 06:16:19 | Re: [SQL] Function .. AS..? |
| Previous Message | Ing. Jhon Carrillo | 2005-02-09 20:57:14 | Function .. AS..? |