Re: Any part of the techdocs/Zope stuff actually work?

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Any part of the techdocs/Zope stuff actually work?
Date: 2005-01-31 17:45:40
Message-ID: 20050131134512.J89998@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

'k, shutdown, and let's see if anyone 'notices' ...

On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Dave Page wrote:

>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: pgsql-www-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
>> [mailto:pgsql-www-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Marc G. Fournier
>> Sent: 31 January 2005 17:23
>> To: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
>> Subject: [pgsql-www] Any part of the techdocs/Zope stuff
>> actually work?
>>
>>
>> Not sure if that whole aspect is broken, or just parts of it
>> ... if the
>> whole thing, is there a reason why we still need the Zope
>> server running?
>
> Thought of that the other day - I couldn't find anything that didn't
> seem to work, so I assume it's not required anymore. Robert/Justin might
> know otherwise though.
>
> /D
>

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2005-01-31 18:12:07 Re: Weekly news online?
Previous Message Dave Page 2005-01-31 17:27:36 Re: Any part of the techdocs/Zope stuff actually work?