Re: [PATCHES] Merge pg_shadow && pg_group -- UNTESTED

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Merge pg_shadow && pg_group -- UNTESTED
Date: 2005-01-23 22:05:28
Message-ID: 20050123220528.GR10437@ns.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

* Alvaro Herrera (alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl) wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 03:14:04PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Smaller patches are easier to review, for sure. Also, you'll need to
> > coordinate with Alvaro's work on dependencies for global objects.
>
> If you want, I can send you the current patch so you can see what has
> changed in it, maybe merge it with some work of yours for separate
> submittal.

Yeah, I'd appriciate seeing it and seeing if/how much it conflicts with
what I'm working on. I'll probably be going back to scratch since there
isn't really anything worthwhile in my patch to build on working towards
what Tom's laid out. Not a problem though, it didn't take me very long
to code. :)

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-01-23 22:06:02 Re: [pgsql-hackers] Re: Extending System Views: proposal for 8.1/8.2
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-01-23 22:00:52 Re: Extending System Views: proposal for 8.1/8.2

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2005-01-23 22:20:11 Re: [PATCHES] Merge pg_shadow && pg_group -- UNTESTED
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2005-01-23 21:36:18 Re: Much Ado About COUNT(*)