Re: 8.1 development cycle (was a couple of other threads

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 8.1 development cycle (was a couple of other threads
Date: 2005-01-21 19:54:48
Message-ID: 20050121155353.S910@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 21 Jan 2005, Joshua D. Drake wrote:

> Hello,
>
> On a slightly different note in regards to the development
> cycle. I am authoring a new book and it would be helpful
> to know the approximate completion of the dev cycle.
>
> If the dev cycle is going to be really short, are we expecting
> a more traditional 12-16 month 8.2?

That seems to be the norm ... my feel for discussions so far is that 8.1's
focus is going to be primarily replacing ARC, and anything else that might
slip in ...

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2005-01-21 20:17:08 Extending System Views: proposal for 8.1/8.2
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-01-21 19:15:56 8.1 development cycle (was a couple of other threads ;))