Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering

From: Darcy Buskermolen <darcy(at)wavefire(dot)com>
To: Mitch Pirtle <mitch(dot)pirtle(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering
Date: 2005-01-20 19:07:23
Message-ID: 200501201107.23964.darcy@wavefire.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On January 20, 2005 10:42 am, Mitch Pirtle wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:33:42 -0800, Darcy Buskermolen
>
> <darcy(at)wavefire(dot)com> wrote:
> > Another Option to consider would be pgmemcache. that way you just build
> > the farm out of lots of large memory, diskless boxes for keeping the
> > whole database in memory in the whole cluster. More information on it
> > can be found at: http://people.freebsd.org/~seanc/pgmemcache/
>
> Which brings up another question: why not just cluster at the hardware
> layer? Get an external fiberchannel array, and cluster a bunch of dual
> Opterons, all sharing that storage. In that sense you would be getting
> one big PostgreSQL 'image' running across all of the servers.

It dosn't quite work that way, thanks to shared memory, and kernel disk cache.
(among other things)
>
> Or is that idea too 90's? ;-)
>
> -- Mitch
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org

--
Darcy Buskermolen
Wavefire Technologies Corp.
ph: 250.717.0200
fx: 250.763.1759
http://www.wavefire.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ragnar Hafstað 2005-01-20 19:12:06 Re: [SQL] OFFSET impact on Performance???
Previous Message Hervé Piedvache 2005-01-20 19:00:03 Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering