| From: | "D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain" <darcy(at)druid(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
| Cc: | tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, neilc(at)samurai(dot)com, jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, jdavis-pgsql(at)empires(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: ARC patent |
| Date: | 2005-01-19 11:55:00 |
| Message-ID: | 20050119065500.32ad5c67.darcy@druid.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 10:53:14 +0100
"Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> wrote:
> An idea around this would be to plan never to release 8.1. Instead,
> direct HEAD towards 8.2 with a normal dev cycle (or rather, let's aim
> for a short one, but in reality short may not be all that short..).
> Then the eventual ARC replacment (assuming there is one) gets
> backpatched to the 8.1 branch which is basically only contains all
> patches from 8.0.x plus the ARC stuff.
Personally I prefer the 8.0.1 route for two reasons.
1. We don't know when (or if) the patent will be granted. 8.0.1 fits in
no matter what and it doesn't sound like we are going backwards.
2. From a marketing standpoint it is easier to sell our bosses/clients
that 8.0.1 is exactly the same as they have running and tested but
without a legal constraint than 8.1 which sounds more like a new
version.
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy(at)druid(dot)net> | Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on
+1 416 425 1212 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-01-19 14:17:37 | Addition to TODO |
| Previous Message | Andreas Pflug | 2005-01-19 11:33:15 | Re: ARC patent |