Neil Conway wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-01-14 at 16:24 +0100, Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote:
> > http://dev.officenet.no/~andreak/pg_dump.c.diff
> 
> Looks good, except for some minor code cleanups and doc updates. Barring
> any objections, I'll clean it up and apply it once we branch 8.0. I
> suppose for consistency we ought to allow multiple schemas to be
> specified via the "-n" option?

I don't remember this patch.  How is it related to the other pg_dump
patches in the 8.1 pathces queue?

> (Speaking of which, is the plan still to branch 8.0 very shortly after
> the 8.0.0 final release?)

I guess we could do that now actually.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

• Re: pgdump at 2005-01-17 04:22:55 from Neil Conway

Responses

• Re: pgdump at 2005-01-17 04:59:50 from Neil Conway

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Neil Conway	Date: 2005-01-17 04:59:50
	Subject: Re: pgdump
Previous:	From: Neil Conway	Date: 2005-01-17 04:22:55
	Subject: Re: pgdump