From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com |
Cc: | Shachar Shemesh <psql(at)shemesh(dot)biz>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: ODBC Rewrite |
Date: | 2004-12-08 03:24:59 |
Message-ID: | 20041208032459.GR10437@ns.snowman.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-odbc |
* markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com (markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com) wrote:
> This is why I suggested either creating a new low level API library on
> which the linkes of ODBC, libpq, and I guess an OLE DB driver would be
> built, or perform an amount of surgery the existing libpq and isolate and
> expose various operations to a normalized API strategy.
Again, it'd probably be better to add the necessary API to libpq so
everyone can benefit from it than to give access to low-level libpq
function externally and have all that code in the ODBC driver which it
wouldn't be available for anyone else...
Also, again I contend that there'd really be much 'surgery' required to
extend the current libpq API to meet the requirements of, at least, the
ODBC driver.
Stephen
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | joy chen | 2004-12-10 18:06:19 | question about timeout attributes |
Previous Message | markw | 2004-12-07 21:55:39 | Re: ODBC Rewrite |