Re: Increasing the length of

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: David Parker <dparker(at)tazznetworks(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Increasing the length of
Date: 2004-12-01 16:47:12
Message-ID: 200412011647.iB1GlCq06535@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

David Parker wrote:
> How difficult would it be to make the combination
>
> log_statement = all
> log_duration = true
>
> just put the duration on the same line as the statement? Then
> log_min_duration_statement could be used to
> do the desired log-at-threshold behavior, which certainly seems
> valuable. You'd need a way to visually/scriptually (?) distinguish those
> log records, though, I guess.
>
> Note that my original post on this was more of a question than an
> objection - it's entirely possible to sed around having duration and
> statement on separate lines - I just wanted clarification. Having them
> on the same line IS handy, however....

Many people want the statement printed when it starts (for real-time
server monitoring), not when it finishes, meaning we don't know the
duration at start time.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Antti Salmela 2004-12-01 17:24:15 Index used incorrectly with regular expressions on 7.4.6
Previous Message Jan Wieck 2004-12-01 16:43:01 Re: Error handling in plperl and pltcl