Re: driver beta release

From: Markus Schaber <schabios(at)logi-track(dot)com>
To: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org, Hunter Hillegas <lists(at)lastonepicked(dot)com>
Subject: Re: driver beta release
Date: 2004-11-10 15:12:20
Message-ID: 20041110161220.22696998@kingfisher.intern.logi-track.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

Hi, Kris,

On Tue, 9 Nov 2004 13:05:48 -0500 (EST)
Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com> wrote:

> > > You can add ?protocolVersion=2 to the JDBC URL. Which will make it use
> > > the older un-parameterized method of sending queries.
> >
> > I thought a "compatible=7.4" setting should do this?
>
> The compatible parameter is largely unused and at the moment only changes
> the behavior of storing binary data. The 7.4 driver implemented the V3
> protocol with the minimum of effort. The 8.0 driver implements (and takes
> advantage of) many V3 features and the partial implementation was
> abandoned. This means making compatible=7.4 mean the V2 protocol isn't
> entirely accurate.

Okay, I thing my statement was ambigous.

I meant to say 'I thought a "compatible=7.4" setting should make the
driver use an un-typed way of sending the queries'. This does not
necessarily imply a switch back to V2 protocol, which may bring other
disadvantages.

But maybe the effort for implementing this is too large, I'll try to
have a look at it.

Thanks,
Markus

--
markus schaber | dipl. informatiker
logi-track ag | rennweg 14-16 | ch 8001 zürich
phone +41-43-888 62 52 | fax +41-43-888 62 53
mailto:schabios(at)logi-track(dot)com | www.logi-track.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2004-11-10 15:37:59 Compilation problem using jikes
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2004-11-10 13:34:38 Row set implementation