| From: | Jan de Visser <jdevisser(at)digitalfairway(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL JDBC <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 1300 to 3100 lines of code for XA support |
| Date: | 2004-11-02 21:22:07 |
| Message-ID: | 200411021622.07878.jdevisser@digitalfairway.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
On November 2, 2004 04:12 pm, Aaron Mulder wrote:
> The only possible safe way to include PostgreSQL in an XA
> transaction is to involve at most one local (PostgreSQL) resource, and
> prepare it last and commit it first. That could be done by an application
> server if it manages the process and knows that the PostgreSQL driver is
> just a local resource.
This is exactly what Weblogic lets you do, but you probably already knew
that :)
JdV!!
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Jan de Visser jdevisser(at)digitalfairway(dot)com
Baruk Khazad! Khazad ai-menu!
--------------------------------------------------------------
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alan Stange | 2004-11-02 21:22:25 | Re: executeBatch() issue with new driver? |
| Previous Message | Oliver Jowett | 2004-11-02 21:19:19 | Re: executeBatch() issue with new driver? |