Re: a bug in pg_dump?

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jaime Casanova <systemguards(at)yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: a bug in pg_dump?
Date: 2004-10-19 19:06:47
Message-ID: 20041019190647.GB5625@dcc.uchile.cl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 02:25:35PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Jaime Casanova <systemguards(at)yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> > but when i do a: pg_dump -C uescc > uescc.sql
> > it add the create statement for the database but not
> > add appropiates alter database for the parameters i
> > set search_path in this case.
>
> > But, pg_dumpall does.
>
> > a bug in pg_dump?
>
> No. That functionality is assigned to pg_dumpall.

There doesn't seem to be a way of extracting only database creation from
pg_dumpall. Or the schema of a single database, for example. There
_is_ a functionality gap here.

ISTM pg_dump -C (which dumps CREATE DATABASE) should dump ALTER DATABASE
commands too.

--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
You liked Linux a lot when he was just the gawky kid from down the block
mowing your lawn or shoveling the snow. But now that he wants to date
your daughter, you're not so sure he measures up. (Larry Greenemeier)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jaime Casanova 2004-10-19 20:45:57 Re: a bug in pg_dump?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-10-19 18:25:35 Re: a bug in pg_dump?