Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Which platfform do you recommend?

From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Which platfform do you recommend?
Date: 2004-10-15 16:33:39
Message-ID: 20041015163339.GO14879@phlogiston.dyndns.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 01:38:45AM +0300, Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:
> 
> For Linux, ext3 seems better, but under some circumstances ext2 could run 
> more stable. Check pgsql-perform list archives for more discussions on 
> filesystems on Linux.

Some time ago, Chris Browne posted some test results he did.  It
turned out that jfs beat xfs, and that either of them completely
trounced both reiser and ext3.  In particular, ext3 was just plain
slow.  We won't consider ext2 because it's too dangerous in case of
crash.

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan  | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
In the future this spectacle of the middle classes shocking the avant-
garde will probably become the textbook definition of Postmodernism. 
                --Brad Holland

In response to

Responses

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Evan RempelDate: 2004-10-15 16:51:37
Subject: Re: Which platfform do you recommend?
Previous:From: Tom CopelandDate: 2004-10-14 20:37:03
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [GENERAL] Reusable pl/pgsql

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group