Re: Avoiding explicit addDataType calls for PostGIS

From: Markus Schaber <schabios(at)logi-track(dot)com>
To: PostGreSQL JDBC <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Avoiding explicit addDataType calls for PostGIS
Date: 2004-10-12 08:57:11
Message-ID: 20041012105711.2eda3dd0@kingfisher.intern.logi-track.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-jdbc

Hi, Oliver,

On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 17:55:27 +1300
Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com> wrote:

> >>If your objective is to produce a driver that automatically supports
> >>the extra datatypes, how about a provider-properties-file approach?
> >
> > That is a nice idea that allows to control default configuration without
> > recompiling, and without explicit code in the app.
>
> Here is a first cut at implementing this.

Great - just what I always dreamed of :-)

And it was on my agenda today to code this - now I can start with testing :-)

Thanks a lot!

Markus

--
markus schaber | dipl. informatiker
logi-track ag | rennweg 14-16 | ch 8001 zürich
phone +41-43-888 62 52 | fax +41-43-888 62 53
mailto:schabios(at)logi-track(dot)com | www.logi-track.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message xiaoling he 2004-10-12 09:16:27 Is it a memory lost of PQmakeEmptyPGresult?
Previous Message Greg Stark 2004-10-12 05:28:07 Re: Need some advice on appropriate PL strategy...

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Markus Schaber 2004-10-12 10:11:13 Re: datatype conversion thoughts
Previous Message Oliver Jowett 2004-10-12 08:23:58 Re: A solution to the SSL customizing problem