Re: Movement of FAQ's

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Movement of FAQ's
Date: 2004-10-12 01:02:17
Message-ID: 20041011220115.D54093@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Mon, 11 Oct 2004, Dave Page wrote:

> No, and I don't think it should be outside. What I would like to avoid
> if possible though, is having win32 problems split across different
> FAQs. Most end users won't care about whether something is a Mingw or
> Installer issue and will just get frustrated if they cannot find the
> info they need.
>
> I guess the best answer might be to clearly mark the Mingw FAQ as a
> diy-compilation FAQ, and include a link for 'normal' end users to the
> installer FAQ in which we try to include all relevant q&a's.

Is there a reason why this can't just be one FAQ with a 'Compiler Issues'
section? Are there *that* many Compiler specific issues that it warrants
a whole FAQ to itself?

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-10-12 01:05:33 Re: Movement of FAQ's
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-10-11 22:51:20 Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Need for DLLINIT in Makefile.shlib (fwd)