| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "J(dot) Andrew Rogers" <jrogers(at)neopolitan(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: First set of OSDL Shared Mem scalability results, |
| Date: | 2004-10-08 23:08:14 |
| Message-ID: | 200410081608.14043.josh@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
Tom,
> This does raise a question for Josh though, which is "where's the
> oprofile results?" If we do have major problems at the level of cache
> misses then oprofile would be able to prove it.
Missing, I'm afraid. OSDL has been having technical issues with STP all week.
Hopefully the next test run will have them.
--
--Josh
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-10-08 23:31:41 | Re: First set of OSDL Shared Mem scalability results, some wierdness ... |
| Previous Message | Steinar H. Gunderson | 2004-10-08 22:39:45 | Re: First set of OSDL Shared Mem scalability results, |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-10-08 23:31:41 | Re: First set of OSDL Shared Mem scalability results, some wierdness ... |
| Previous Message | Steinar H. Gunderson | 2004-10-08 22:39:45 | Re: First set of OSDL Shared Mem scalability results, |