BUG #1276: Backend panics on SETVAL('..', 0)...

From: "PostgreSQL Bugs List" <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: BUG #1276: Backend panics on SETVAL('..', 0)...
Date: 2004-10-03 05:10:03
Message-ID: 20041003051003.BD6CB5A103A@www.postgresql.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs


The following bug has been logged online:

Bug reference: 1276
Logged by: Sean Chittenden

Email address: sean(at)chittenden(dot)org

PostgreSQL version: 8.0 Beta

Operating system: OS-X, FreeBSD

Description: Backend panics on SETVAL('..', 0)...

Details:

I haven't been able to reproduce this in a controlled way, but on a large
schema create in a single transaction, I was doing a SETVAL('foo_id_seq', 0)
and the backend was panicing, which seems broken. This is using HEAD from a
few hrs ago, but it's been going on for a while... I just stumbled across
this again while online and it jogged my memory. -sc

ERROR: setval: value 0 is out of bounds for sequence "foo_id_seq"
(1..9223372036854775807)
FATAL: block 0 of 1663/97972/98006 is still referenced (private 1, global
1)
server closed the connection unexpectedly
This probably means the server terminated abnormally
before or while processing the request.
connection to server was lost

dba(at)db: [local] 4030 2004-10-01 03:31:39 PDT LOG: statement: SELECT
SETVAL('schemaa.foo_id_seq'::TEXT, (SELECT MAX(id) FROM schemaa.foo));
dba(at)db: [local] 4030 2004-10-01 03:31:39 PDT ERROR: setval: value 0 is
out of bounds for sequence "foo_id_seq" (1..9223372036854775807)
dba(at)db: [local] 4030 2004-10-01 03:31:39 PDT FATAL: block 0 of
1663/97972/98006 is still referenced (private 1, global 1)
dba(at)db: [local] 4030 2004-10-01 03:31:39 PDT LOG: disconnection:
session time: 0:00:02.37 user=dba database=db host=[local] port=

--
Sean Chittenden

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-10-03 05:26:42 Re: BUG #1276: Backend panics on SETVAL('..', 0)...
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-10-02 00:48:45 Re: semicolon not required on END statement