Re: Mislabeled timestamp functions (was Re: [SQL] [NOVICE] date_trunc'd

From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>
To: Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Mislabeled timestamp functions (was Re: [SQL] [NOVICE] date_trunc'd
Date: 2004-10-03 01:16:41
Message-ID: 20041003011641.GB19221@wolff.to
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-novice pgsql-sql

On Sat, Oct 02, 2004 at 15:04:51 -0500,
Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 02, 2004 at 10:43:01 +0200,
>
> There has been such a distinction for a major release or two. "Stable"
> is how you mark a function that will return the same value within a
> single transaction.

I should have said within a single statement instead of within a single
transaction.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Browne 2004-10-03 01:35:48 Re: AIX and V8 beta 3
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-10-02 23:23:27 Re: AIX and V8 beta 3

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Madhukar Gole 2004-10-03 03:12:40 Help needed to set parameters in postgresql.conf
Previous Message Vitaly Belman 2004-10-02 21:59:00 Writing plpgsql not in a function (directly from plsql)?

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bosko Vukov 2004-10-03 07:36:09
Previous Message Bruno Wolff III 2004-10-02 20:04:51 Re: Mislabeled timestamp functions (was Re: [SQL] [NOVICE] date_trunc'd